Thanks to LatinoReview.com and JustJared.com, check out the new pics from Ridley Scott’s upcoming Robin Hood movie starring Russell Crowe. The first one has Crowe riding on a horse, the second is a close up of him walking, and the third has him driving a cart?
Are you looking forward to another Robin Hood movie?
- Dennis
Source:
http://www.latinoreview.com/news/new-robin-hood-set-pics-men-in-tights-indeed-7150
Wasn't that interested in the concept of making a film about the Sheriff of Nottingham, even less so now it's just another Robin Hood picture
I'm not too sure how this movie is much different than previous Robin Hood movies, other than the fact that Gladiator Maximus is in it.
Dennis
Yes, but if that third picture IS in the movie – I'd see it like seven times.
Yes, that would be pretty awesome, if suddenly during the big battle at the end of the movie Russell Crowe/Robin Hood come and save the day ala Dukes of Hazard/General Lee Style and bust through the enemy soldiers with that cart that looks like a jeep, hahahahha
Dennis
Agreed.
Crowe's MADE his fortune. SO why is he wasting so much
time on uninspired, unoriginal, routine slop?
—ESP. on this, the once again 'mysteriously overlooked'
60th Anniversary of the epic, urgently relevant —indeed,
STILL unfolding —KOREAN WAR…
Russell! —-WHERE ARE YOU?
Actually- for the idiot Americans- the previous Robin Hood's were based on the folk-hero not the actual historical figure- and all were as camp as a San Fransisco scouting club.
Ridley Scott's brilliant new film, much like "Kingdom of Heaven" will portray the character believed to be the source of the Robin Hood myth- who was a Norman or Bretagne ally of Richard who was away on crusades when the thoroughly vicious King John took over his throne.
Those who abhor the stale intellectually offensive rubbish of Los Ang-Jew-les, films which portray Islam or Catholicism in a positive light (note not a Jewish investors on the multi-billion dollar success "Passion of Christ" – which was near word-for-word depiction of the Gospel of Matthew) or who have more than 200 years of history are able to appreciate such films.
But- as a fellow money-laundering Jew is not directing it- the J-ollywood sch-mafia are horrified by more competent competitors- and thus "diss it" at any opportunity
Edit: Ridley Scott's new film, much like "Kingdom of Heaven" will be historically sensitive. This is missing from the above comment